Key Takeaways: 

• State-level TCPA and Do Not Call laws are evolving rapidly, requiring organizations to monitor both federal and local regulations to stay compliant. 
• Key 2025 updates include Maine’s RND mandate, Florida’s revised mini-TCPA, and new telemarketing laws in Oklahoma and Washington, with more states likely to follow. 
• Differences in calling hours, consent standards, registration, and autodialer rules make a one-size-fits-all compliance approach risky. 
• Gryphon AI helps businesses navigate this complexity through automated compliance tools, real-time call blocking, and centralized oversight. 

The patchwork of telemarketing laws by state is shifting faster than many organizations can keep up. As state lawmakers introduce new rules and amend existing ones, staying aligned with both federal and state-level Do Not Call regulations is no longer optional. For any team managing outbound sales or customer outreach, understanding the intricacies of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) laws by state has become essential to operating safely and competitively across the U.S. 

At a time when consumer privacy is under a microscope, overlooking local calling laws can lead to serious penalties. This blog provides a current look at state-by-state TCPA and Do Not Call restrictions, including updates for 2025 and what your compliance team needs to watch closely in the coming year. 

Understanding the TCPA and Do Not Call Framework 

The TCPA was introduced to protect consumers from unwanted or intrusive telemarketing calls. It governs how, when, and to whom businesses can reach out via phone, text, and prerecorded messages. Common violations include calling individuals listed on the National Do Not Call Registry, contacting someone whose number has been reassigned, using an auto-dialer without consent, or failing to honor opt-out requests. 

On top of federal rules, every state has the power to impose its own Do Not Call regulations by state, often expanding the federal guidelines with stricter consent requirements, unique time restrictions, or additional registration processes. These variations make outbound calling compliance more than a one-size-fits-all checklist. 

Why State Laws Demand Closer Attention 

Recent years have seen states assert greater independence in shaping outbound calling and texting regulations, often responding to increasing public demand for consumer protection. 

Florida’s “mini‑TCPA” creates stricter requirements than the federal TCPA, while Oklahoma and Washington have introduced their own enhanced telemarketing statutes and expanded enforcement mechanisms. Meanwhile, Maine now mandates the use of the Reassigned Numbers Database (RND), requiring businesses to verify number ownership before calling. 

Because of this divergence, businesses must evaluate telemarketing calling hours by state, consent standards, and registration requirements on a granular level — not just at the national level. 

Key State-Level Differences to Know 

1. Calling Hours: At the federal level, calls are generally limited to the hours between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time. Many states adopt tighter windows or add special rules. For instance, Texas shifts the earliest permissible calling time to 9 a.m. on certain days, and other states cap evenings or apply different weekend and holiday calling rules. Understanding telemarketing calling hours by state is critical for cross-regional campaigns. 
2. Registration and Renewal: While the national DNC list is well‑known, many Do Not Call states maintain separate registries that require businesses to register (and in many cases renew annually). These state lists often include different exemptions for existing customer relationships and vary widely in their definitions and requirements. 
3. Consent Requirements: Consent requirements vary significantly at the state level. While the federal standard demands prior express written consent for many automated marketing contacts, states such as Florida mandate more clearly affirmative action by the consumer (for example, checking a box or replying to a text). Many jurisdictions also enforce enhanced opt‑out rules, such as requiring a “STOP” response or providing a dedicated toll‑free opt‑out number. 
4. Automated Calling Restrictions: Several states place strict limits on the use of autodialers and prerecorded messages — sometimes extending those restrictions into business‑to‑business outreach. Regulations also increasingly target caller ID spoofing, aggressive call frequency, and dialing strategies that don’t account for the recipient’s time zone. 

2025’s Most Notable Updates 

• Maine has implemented a new requirement mandating that telemarketers consult the Reassigned Numbers Database (RND) before placing sales calls. Though the rule took effect in July 2024, it remains a key focus in 2025 and beyond as businesses work to reduce the risk of inadvertently contacting reassigned or recycled numbers. 
• Florida has amended its mini-TCPA, the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act, to clarify definitions of autodialing systems and reinforce documentation standards for consumer consent. These updates are reshaping how businesses approach compliance in the state. 
• Oklahoma and Washington have enacted enhanced state-level telemarketing laws that expand regulatory authority and create additional enforcement pathways, including private rights of action. Both states are signaling greater scrutiny of outbound sales practices. 
• New Jersey and Massachusetts are reportedly considering new telemarketing legislation that would introduce tighter controls on unsolicited calls. While specific bills are still under discussion, both states are aligned with a broader national trend toward stronger consumer protections. 

For teams dialing across jurisdictions, these differences create a high-stakes maze of requirements.  

Strategies to Stay Ahead 

To manage these challenges, businesses need a centralized compliance plan supported by strong internal practices and AI technology. That means: 

• Consolidating regulatory data into a single compliance dashboard. 
• Automatically scrubbing call lists regularly against federal and state DNC registries. 
• Verifying consumer consent before each campaign. 
• Training teams to recognize and respect opt-outs and regional call limits. 
• Incorporating tools that can automate rule enforcement in real time. 

The Cost of Getting It Wrong 

Statutory damages under the TCPA start at $500 per unlawful call or message and can rise to $1,500 per call when the violation is willful or knowing. On top of those per‑call penalties, companies have faced multimillion‑dollar class actions arising in part from placement of calls to numbers that had been reassigned without updated consent or verification. The financial risk is substantial, but reputational damage, legal fees, and loss of customer trust often carry heavy costs. 

Awareness alone isn’t enough to prevent these outcomes. Staying compliant requires continuous diligence supported by the right tools.  

How Gryphon AI Makes Compliance Easier 

Gryphon AI delivers a solution built for the real-world complexity of TCPA laws by state. With features like real-time call blocking, consent tracking, and seamless integration with the RND, Gryphon AI equips organizations to handle multi-state outreach with confidence. Its platform provides automated updates for regulatory changes, centralized oversight, and tools that guide reps in the moment, preventing violations before they happen. 

Whether you’re managing compliance at scale or updating processes for the year ahead, Gryphon ONE helps protect your brand and your bottom line. Learn more about how Gryphon AI supports compliant outreach on the Gryphon ONE platform.