In addition to moving closer toward an exclusive opt-in framework for telemarketing, the changes to the TCPA going into effect in October also increase the marketer’s responsibility for proof of compliance with the law, reiterating the the burden on a marketer to defend himself against any do not call investigation.

This is a trend we’ve covered extensively.

This spring, a major financial services firm ran into trouble with FINRA and New Hampshire’s regulators because, even though the firm believed it complied with the letter of the law, it did not appropriate set or meet consumer expectations. The law states that it is the consumer’s perception, not the company’s intent, which determines if consumer expectations were or were not met.

In this example, the financial service firm used door-to-door visits with prospects to create what it saw as an established business relationship (EBR) exemption for making unsolicited calls to those consumers, even if their number was registered on the National Do-Not-Call Registry. While the business may feel a five-minute conversation on a door step establishes a business relationship, the consumers did not and it’s their perception that matters.

In addition, this summer, the FTC released revisions to the Telemarketing Sales Rule. These revisions – its third round to the rule in the last 10 years –included requirements that telemarketers not just obtain express written consent to, but also thoroughly document how and when they obtained that express written consent.

Telemarketers can avoid consumer complaints – which can lead to regulatory investigation or at least increased scrutiny – by ensuring they set consumer’s expectations for why, when, how often, and about what they will be contacted by a telemarketer.

Furthermore, telemarketers are responsible for documenting how those expectations are set in the event a consumer complains anyway, since the burden of proof of compliance lies with the marketer.

Gryphon’s centralized contact governance services make it simple to automatically document when and how your agents obtain consent from prospects and consumers, creating an auditable record to protect your businesses in the event of an inquiry or investigation.

Introducing Powerful New Compliance Features for Gryph for Collections:
Boost Contact Rates, Debt Recovery, and Protection

We’re thrilled to announce new features for Gryph for Collections! This update enhances customization, expands contact points, and strengthens screening controls, providing debt collectors with advanced compliance protection.  What is…

Navigating the Regulatory Shift: Ensuring State-Level TCPA and DNC Compliance in an Evolving Landscape

There are many reasons to maintain contact compliance. First and foremost, it’s the law. Additionally, failing to ensure collections contact compliance can lead to possible litigation, class action lawsuits, loss…

Mastering Telemarketing Regulatory Disclosures: Tips for Compliant Communication

In today’s complex regulatory telemarketing landscape, understanding and adhering to regulatory disclosures is crucial for businesses across all industries. These mandatory statements ensure transparency, protect consumer rights, and maintain fair…